Відео

Brother what the camera app version while recording this video

Can you record video with such low shutter speed setting too? Many of the other app that I found and tested can’t go slower than 1/24. What is the slowest setting in Proshot for video? Thanks

Thank you for this video

I got this telescope aswell

Well done, exactly what I was looking for, thank you.

A 1:04

Like! Aren't the tripod and mount too weak for this telescope ? Does is wobble / vibrate ?

Mask selected shape ipad

Thanks for the video, I was confused with everything till I found this one, nice and simple to ❤

Great video, exactly what I needed to see to finally unbox my 130EQ and get started!

I just bought one of these at a garage sale for 40 bucks it was brand-new looking problem is pulling off the clearblue protective film on the equator thingamabob I it caused it to move in relation to the pointer how do I find 0

Thank you❤️

What's the maximum zoom?

The lowest I can go with the shutterspeed is 8. Any fix to that?

is there a way to lock the exposeure while taking a video. My Nokia camera app has no exposure lock button, so i tried this app too, but again, no exposure lock.

Excelente trabajo y una edición de video profesional.

Elon? Coincidence? I don't think so…

A nice beginners telescope 🔭

How do you fit the starpointer??

Bro can u help me use it, I set it up but showing nothing

Can this do DSO(Deep-Sky Objects)?

Bro I’m I have the same model telescope, pointing at the moon rn with a 20mm lens, and I can’t see anything.

thank you for this video! it took me a lot of time to point at something as big as the moon since i used to randomly point at the sky. those readings are definitely gonna help!

how do i make it go up and down?

Thanks! That was an great into! Just got mine and your video cleared up something for me! 👍🏽

thanks good video

LOL

My DEC lock broke inside, anybody know a fix?

How add a soundtrack

Y do u have so many more settings than me? I have a EOS rebel t5i

Thaaaaaank u so much !!! 🙏🙏🙏✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼

Measurments are wrong because you need to use spherical geometry calculations to convert latitude and longitude of the locations into distances

thank you

just got one for my Brithday ...ok MARVIN (cartoon from Bug Bunny)

My photo size after upload to Google Drive is reduced, may I know how can I keep it at its original size?

can you tell us, will we be able to see nebula with this

Hi, with same telesvope i dont see very sharp image whether i use 20mm or 10mm supplied eyepuece when i watch objects around like tree leaves at a distance of .5 km. Could something be wrong with its optics?

thanks!!! just what I needed.

Do you recommend a 130/650 or a 130/900?

The size of moon craters are 600,000km and greater so you are wrong

can you recomend me a better scope thats got a real parabolic mirror and does not have the bird jones issue please. any thing around this price or a bit higher

THANK YOU SO MUCH!!! I wanted to throw my ipad because of frustration trying to find that feature. 🤣🤣🤣

Thank you

This telescope with spherical mirrors with a "short" focal distance, as a result of large spherical distortion, especially with an increase of more than 60-70. I do not recommend buying a telescope (and the like with the short sphere).

Probably? In astronomy there is NO PROBABLY!

A bit of a background for this telescope: If this is your first scope, you won't have a point of reference to compare, (and I'm guessing others are in a similar situation) but of all the issues listed the one that'll be "hidden" somewhat is the fact that the primary mirror is spherical at a relatively fast focal ratio. The mirror is literally incapable of focusing all the light hitting it into a single plane...this means that it's near impossible to resolve fine details...like the cloud bands on Jupiter and the Cassini division in Saturn's rings. Typically these are the first targets newer folks are excited to see, and then are disappointed and/or think there's something wrong with the scope. You can collimate it within an inch of it's life and thermally acclimate it for hours and the image will still be "soft" compared to a parabolic mirror...which can be had in scopes that cost less. But I guess many of you would agree with me if you once tried a Dobson, let's say a 6" with reasonable focus length and a real parabolic mirror. So I say to anyone who has not yet bought it: 'Think twice! There are better options!' The problem I have with these scopes is that the advertisement makes people dream of things like Astro Photography which just can't come true (Me Too!). There is no long exposure possible with this mount. And the ease of tracking is not worth for visual as it is only a question of a bit of experience to do this with a Dobson or other alt-az mounts so there is no need for the (quite expensive) EQ mount. This money is better spent for the optics. And here the DOBSON can't be beaten, as the mount is extremely cheap AND extremely stable. The mirror is spherical not parabolic after collimation it was just about bearable. Good enough for the moon for sure . I saw Saturn with it just about but with no detail white/yellow slightly blurry blob with a ring around it. Kind of cool. The stand was extremely wobbly and the legs start to bend out after a while like.it can't take the weight. The focuser teeth also started to break off making focusing a real chore and don't get me started on the motor drive. Planetary photography is also not impossible if that is your end game. You can easily get a tabletop Dobson for the money that will do a way better job than the 130eq.

I like and already subscribed

This is very helpful. Thank you so much.

Do you have any other telescopes?

Not helpful at all